As I’ve stated before, I am a history teacher and also college counselor at Wyoming Seminary, a extremely related to prep school with an worldwide reputation for preparing its graduates for higher education and learning. By almost any type of measurement, Wyoming Seminary students are successful in the college adobjectives process and also generally speaking the majority of parental fees (who after all pay the bills) seem satisfied through the outcome of their children’s secondary education. Tbelow is, yet, a spectre haunting our adgoals office–no, not that one--the spectre of the Ivy Organization.

Some civilization have actually complained that not enough of our students wind up attending the a lot of elite universities. Tright here are a number of reasons why this is so, many notably that incredibly few of our students apply to those colleges (though 36% of our students were admitted to colleges that accept much less than 1/3 of complete applicants, which I call “elite” colleges). While many type of people describe “the Ivy League” as short hand also for the a lot of selective colleges, the picture is more complex. Out of over 3500 establishments of greater learning in the USA, the majority of accept the majority of applicants; only 42 accept 20% or fewer (and the list arrays from the Ivies to locations you can not intend, including conservatories such as Curtis Institute at 5% and Juilliard at 7.5% and Historically Babsence Colleges and Universities such as Rust College at 14% and Albany type of State University at 20%).

You are watching: Don t send your kids to the ivy league

But an write-up recently publimelted in the New Republic has actually spurred additionally discussion around this problem. William Deresiewicz is a previous instructor at Yale and also author of the forthcoming “Excellent Sheep: The Miseducation of the Amerideserve to Elite and The Way to a Meaningful Life“. His post raised numerous interesting topics and created heated disagreement on the internet. The adhering to will certainly summarize Deresiewicz’s concepts together with some thoughts and also observations of my very own. 

Deresiewicz’s primary points are:

Students that have actually “won the race” to get admission to elite colleges are cluemuch less, sheltered and also narrow-minded automalots.

College is the finest time/location to be a learner, and the best colleges should be the ideal at teaching, but they are not

Students at these schools are risk-averse and also mostly unhappy, most likely because the adobjectives process (consisting of proximate aspects favor the application, and even more far-off ones like the curricula and experiences at prep schools favor mine) is narrow and also empty and the idea of a “well-rounded” teen (not to mention a “pointy” one) is wildly out of whack

The elite colleges in America are assets of the economic inehigh quality in the nation and also actively job-related to maintain this by concentrating on admitting so many type of civilization that have the right to afford to pay their stratospheric tuitions. 


Deresiewicz has actually been lived in for years on the topic of the “disbenefits of an elite education“, having actually composed self-consciously about being unable to converse via the “brief, beefy with a goatee and a Red Sox cap and also a thick Boston accent” that had involved solve his pipes. While Deresiewicz may have opted to check out a therapist to attend to his anti-social awkwardness he appears to have actually liked to create around his troubles instead. I think we learn quite a little bit about William Deresiewicz c. 2008 when he observes:


“My education taught me to believe that civilization who didn’t go to an Ivy Organization or identical institution weren’t worth talking to, regardmuch less of their course. I was offered the unmistakable message that such people were beneath me. We were “the ideal and the brightest,” as these locations love to say, and everyone else was, well, something else: much less great, much less bideal. I learned to provide that bit nod of expertise, that slightly sympathetic “Oh,” when world told me they went to a less prestigious college.”

In other words, he is a (recovering?) elitist that believes that his own experiences were typical. Six years later on he still appears to be hung up on this principle, admitting:

“I have to say this topic is incredibly personal for me. Like so many kind of youngsters now, I went off to college favor a sleepwalker. You determined the the majority of prestigious location that let you in; up ahead were vaguely understood objectives: standing, wealth–“success.” What it supposed to actually obtain an education and learning and also why you might want one–every one of this was off the table. It was only after 24 years in the Ivy League–college and a Ph.D at Columbia, ten years on the faculty at Yale–that I started to think around what this mechanism does to kids…”

Ignore the self-aware resume listing (I guess it is a difficult halittle bit to break) and note how artlessly Deresiewicz transforms from initially person (“I went off to college”) to second perkid (“You determined the most prestigious area that let you in”); he still seems to think that all Ivy League survivors have shared his experiences. Personally, I doubt this. A previous student at our school (who was the valedictorian as well as a captain of multiple sports teams that won multiple state championships and also a committed leader of multiple neighborhood business efforts) is in her last year at at an Ivy Organization institution. She responded to Deresiewicz by writing:


“I am that I am because of my education and learning at Wyoming Seminary and the University of Pennsylvania – I’ve been extended to my borders and also tested each and eincredibly day in these environments (not “pandered” to or offered “higher marks for shoddier work-related prefer the original New Republic article states). Penn has actually allowed me to combine my science discovering via the liberal arts and also check out a entirety brand-new scholastic world…. Above all, Penn has aided me unlock my passion for business and also work-related to incorporate that right into all of my activities and also my future career…”

I am generally reluctant to assume that experiences are global, and so I am hesitant to accept that Deresiewicz’s hangups have brought about scores of hundreds of elite college alumni to come to be social cripples once challenged with “inferiors”. I prefer to believe that a perboy that has pursued education and learning for the right reasons (personal expansion and also self-actualization) will be open to others, and if they were raised appropriate, they will certainly as we say in Yiddish, be a “mensch“, not a “bulvan“. Oh, and the means to converse with the plumber? Ask him just how he is doing, offer him something to drink, and also make banal monitorings around the Red Sox, that were on their way to winning the World Series. It’s not rocket surgery.


Another of Deresiewicz’s pertains to is that elite colleges are concentrated on the financial “rerotate on investment” for their graduates (high paying jobs) fairly than what he thinks should be their emphasis: teaching students exactly how to think and also just how to “build a self”. He rhapsodizes that:

“…it is just through the act of establishing interaction in between the mind and also the heart, the mind and experience, that you become an individual, a unique being–a soul. The project of college is to help you to start to execute that. Books, ideas, works of art and also thought, the push of the minds approximately you that are in search of their own answers in their very own methods.

College isn’t the only opportunity to learn to think, yet it is the finest. One thing is certain: If you haven’t began by the time you end up your B.A., there’s bit likelihood you’ll do it later. That is why an undergraduate endure devoted exclusively to career preparation is 4 years mostly wasted.”

Leaving aside that if one aspires to be a professor and also expert writer Deresiewicz’ best college endure IS “career preparation”, it appears that Mr. Ivy League is involved that human being without college degrees (or through the wrong kind of degrees) may think that world that don’t have no soul. All they are fit for is to come to be plumbers (and also probably Red Sox fans)…

Deresiewicz argues that elite colleges are “technocratic”, and only “train in the analytic and rhetorical skills that are crucial for success in service and the professions.” As an outcome, he believes that (other than for the sciences) these colleges treat students as “‘customers’, people to be pandered to rather of challenged…the result is higher marks for shoddier job-related.” Grade inflation is a difficulty at elite colleges, probably bereason professors believe that anyone great sufficient to gain in to their school is above average. I am willing to stipulate that it is probably a difficulty that the a lot of commonly awarded grade at Harvard is right A’s. On the other hand also, as a proud graduate of Hampshire College, I have never believed that qualities have actually any kind of definition in the first place, so I can’t gain as well operated up about this. 


Deresiewicz frets that students at elite colleges are so worn down by press that it reasons emotional damage. He describes a woguy whose boyfriend at Yale that faces the “stigma of eating alone and also whether he’s netfunctioning enough” and realizes that tbelow is “a bigger social reward for being able to talk around books than for actually analysis them.” The mental issues facing college students have actually come to be a major issue anywhere, not simply at elite institutions and also their reasons are more complicated than Deresiewicz seems to think. To Deresiewicz:

“Look beneath the façade of seammuch less well-adjustment, and what you often find are toxic levels of are afraid, stress and anxiety and also depression, of emptiness and aimlessness and also isolation. A large survey of college freshmen newly discovered that self-reports of emotional well-being have fallen to their lowest level in the study’s 25-year history.

So extreme are the admission standards now that youngsters who regulate to obtain into elite colleges have actually, by definition, never knowledgeable anything but success. The prospect of not doing well terrifies them, disorients them. The price of falling short, also temporarily, becomes not merely practical yet existential. The outcome is a violent aversion to hazard.

…There are exceptions, kids that insist, versus all odds, on trying to get a actual education. But their suffer often tends to make them feel choose freaks. One student told me that a frifinish of hers had actually left Yale because she discovered the school “stifling to the components of yourself that you’d call a spirit.”

Despite having “been on the faculty” (he never calls himself a professor, so he may not have actually been on the tenure track) at Yale for a decade, Deresiewicz cannot discover a student able to directly sheight around the experience; instead the anecdotes intended to generalize around a widespread trouble come from someone’s boyfriend, and also an additional student’s other frifinish. Note additionally, the confidence via which Deresiewicz asserts that students at elite colleges have actually “never knowledgeable anypoint but success”. How deserve to he perhaps recognize the life endure of countless people? As a college counselor I gain to understand my students incredibly well, and also just bereason a son have the right to be popular and also earn great grades in high institution doesn’t expect that their resides are simple, or an uninterrupted upward trajectory. Honestly, periodically the nerve of this guy renders me wonder if he knows just how to talk to anyone, even if they are trim, clean-shaven and think baseround is an uncouth variation of cricket. 

Deresiewicz’ essay starts with a fly-on-the-wall description of a meeting of Yale’s adobjectives committee, trying to evaluate candidays from eastern Pennsylvania. He claims he was told that “successful applicants might either be ‘well-rounded’ or ‘pointy’–outstanding in one certain way–but if they were pointy, they had to be really pointy: a musician whose audition tape had actually impressed the music department, a scientist that had actually won a national award.” He goes on to refer to them as “Super People” who have “a dual major, a sport, a musical instrument, a pair of foreign langueras, organization occupational in distant corners of the world, a couple of hobbies thrvery own in for excellent measure: they have actually mastered them all, and also with a peaceful self-assurance that leaves adults and peers alike in awe.”

According to Deresiewicz, these super world have actually decreased their resides to college esstates. Having gone a pair of paragraphs without pontificating, he huffs:


“From discovering to commodify your experiences for the application, the next action has been to look for out experiences in order to have actually them to commodify. The New York Times reports that tright here is now a thriving sector devoted to producing essay-ready summers, but what strikes one is the superficiality of the activities involved: a month traveling about Italy studying the Renaissance, ‘a whole day’ via a band also of renegade artists: a whole day!

I’ve noticed something similar when it comes to company. Why is it that world feel the must go to Guatemala to perform their tasks of rescue or documentation, instead of Milwaukee or Arkansas? When students carry out continue to be in the States, why is it that so many type of head for New Orleans? Perhaps it’s no surpincrease, once kids are trained to think of organization as somepoint they are eventually doing for themselves–that is, for their résumés. ‘Do well by doing good’ goes the slogan. How around just doing good?”

When Deresiewicz defines “superficiality” he immediately cites children who spfinish “a month traveling roughly Italy examining the Renaissance”–what a bunch of posers! I would most likely describe human being that make broad generalizations without doing any actual study, however what perform I know? And I am not at all sure what his beef is versus Guatemala. But what really gets me around this passage is his snarky dig at the “slogan” about doing well by doing excellent. This is pretty much the structure of philanthropy in our culture, however Deresiewicz seems to think that it is simply somepoint that shenable, cenable, wealthy, hyper-achieving teens choose to say to themselves after dooming Milwaukee to even more years of desperation without neighborhood company jobs. 

I am start my nineteenth year working at prep institutions, and having actually spent more than salso of those years as a college counselor I think that I might have simply as excellent a sense of the college adgoals game as Deresiewicz acquired from his couple of hours observing in the spring of 2008. To me, admissions to the most elite institutions is by definition (to paraphrase Deresiewicz) very hard to obtain. Colleges through admissions rates of 33% or much less (not to point out the colleges through single digit acceptance rates) are able to take their pick of students. If they wanted to, they might admit nopoint yet valedictorians and National Merit Finalists. But the point is, they don’t desire to. According to this article from Stanford University’s (via an admission rate of 5.1%) alumni magazine:

“Tright here is no formula,” Shaw says. For the alumni of a school that resides on the forward boundary of the digital frontier, wbelow arrays of 1s and also 0s have actually transcreated life as we recognize it, this is unsettling. Even perfect test scores don’t guarantee admission. Far from it: 69 percent of Stanford’s applicants over the previous 5 years with SATs of 2400—the highest possible score possible—didn’t acquire in. 


In addition, applicants aren’t simply competing versus various other stellar scholars. They’re also contending against situations. “Whether or not one young perboy gets in is not necessarily identified by what they’ve done and what their attributes are and also their abilities and so on,” says Provost John Etchemendy, to whom Shaw reports. “It also relies on the all at once mix of world that have actually used that year and bubbresulted in the top. So one year, being a tuba player might be really vital. And one more year, well, tbelow are currently these five even better tuba players and also we don’t need one more.” 

Cardinal head footround coach David Shaw, ’94, doesn’t authorize quarterbacks only. He tries to build a team. So, too, does Rick Shaw. That’s where the word “holistic” comes in. Stanford, in enhancement to wanting exceptional scholars, also desires to carry in a pre-constructed community populated by kids from eincredibly stop on the geographic, socioeconomic and also talent spectrums. 

“When takes students,” states Figueroa, that, as an adgoals officer at Wesleyan College was profiled in The Gatekeepers (2002), “you deserve to regularly view they are not taking simply a number. They are taking the personality, the talent. They are taking the contributions that aren’t always noticeable at first glance. I view it firsthand through my very own students that apply—who gets admitted and also who doesn’t.”

Shaw acknowledges that component of the testimonial is subjective, which renders a denial of a premium candidate all the harder to accept. “We leave behind extraplain young human being. There’s not a constituency that isn’t upset. That’s not just true for alumni youngsters. My consolation prize is that I recognize those kids are going to be fine. They might be disappointed for a while, but they will wind up at incredibly excellent institutions and carry out exceptionally well.”

The Stanford post also admits that each applicant just gets around 15 minutes of evaluation as component of the “holistic” admissions procedure (except for heritage students, who get looked at twice). So via that in mind, and since qualities and also test scores will certainly probably be pretty much the very same for most applicants, is it any kind of wonder that we advise students that the method to differentiate themselves is through their individual statement? It is additionally why we urge students to apply to a diverse list of colleges. I tell students that they must only apply to colleges that they desire to attfinish, however that they should make certain that some of the colleges they use to have more welcoming adgoals rates. 22% of students nationwide use to more than salso colleges, though at our institution the average number of applications is nine. With this being the instance, students must have the ability to use to one or more “reach” schools while still making sure that they will have actually a safe area to land regardless.

Deresiewicz’s last point is probably the a lot of serious one, and also is something that I wrestle with regularly. As he writes: 


“Let’s not child ourselves: The college adobjectives game is not mostly around the reduced and middle classes seeking to rise, or even about the upper-middle class attempting to maintain its place. It is around determining the specific hierarchy of condition within the upper-middle class itself. In the affluent suburbs and also well-heeled metropolitan enclaves where this game is principally played, it is not about whether you go to an elite institution. It’s around which one you go to. It is Penn versus Tufts, not Penn versus Penn State. It doesn’t matter that a bideal young perkid have the right to go to Ohio State, become a doctor, resolve in Dayton and make a very great living. Such a result is sindicate as well horrible to contemplate.

This mechanism is exacerbating inequality, retarding social mobility, perpetuating privilege, and also creating an elite that is isolated from the society that it’s intended to lead. The numbers are undeniable. In 1985, 46% of incoming freshguys at the 250 many selective colleges came from the top quarter of the income distribution. By 2000 it was 55%. As of 2006 only about 15% of students at the most competitive schools came from the bottom fifty percent. The even more prestigious the school, the even more unequal its student body is apt to be….

See more: I Was Your Knight In Shining Armor : Discovering Your Lifelong Love

The significant factor for this trfinish is clear. Not boosting tuition…yet the ever-prospering expense of production kids that are fit to contend in the college admissions game….Wealthy families start buying their children’s method into elite colleges almost from the moment they are born: music lessons, sporting activities equipment, international travel (“enrichment” programs to usage the all-too-perfect term)–the majority of important, of course, exclusive school tuition or the costs of living in a location through top tier public colleges. The SAT is meant to meacertain aptitude, however what it actually actions is is parental income”

Once again it is simple to dismiss out on Deresiewicz’s feigned shock at the horrors of living in Dayton (what does this guy have against the midwest? It’s not favor human being tright here have actually Boston accents). But he is ideal that tright here is heated competition among America’s well-off (and nouveau riche) to acquire their children a leg up. I know: I occupational at a prep school (located next to a city where 33% of college age kids are in poverty) with day student tuition and also expenses of $25,000 year; despite having an extremely generous financial help budgain, the majority of of my students are “top middle class” and also have actually parents that are professionals. I have constantly discovered it important to make sure that my students knew that their experiences were not global. That shelp, tright here are even more than a token number of students at my school that come from exceptionally disadvantaged backgrounds, so I attempt not to generalize. 

It have the right to be a difficulty once students controversy around whether to incorporate indevelopment in their applications that inadvertently disclose hints around their family’s finances (ranging from detailing yearly vacations in the Caribbean to describing school-year component time jobs) bereason one would certainly hope that colleges would admit students based upon their merits; unfortunately, many need to take finances right into account. While many kind of top-tier, wealthy establishments have been increasing financial assist recently, their “sticker prices” proceed to rise. Perhaps as an outcome of this, most low-earnings students don’t even apply to four-year colleges. 

Income inehigh quality is a major problem, and also as a teacher I think about it my duty to make certain that my students understand also it. But I do not agree through Deresiewicz that “the education system hregarding act to alleviate the class system, not reproduce it.” Several of his suggestions, such as “placing even more value on the type of business jobs that lower-revenue students often take in high school and that high achievers nearly never do” and “ should refuse to be impressed by any kind of chance that was permitted by parental wealth” seem reasonable. Similarly, I tfinish to agree that things would be much better if colleges “speak cooperating through UNITED STATE News.” But his other suggestions range from the silly (“

recommendations for heritages and athletes should be discarded”) to the picayune (“colleges should put an finish to résumé stuffing by imposing a limit on the variety of extracurriculars students deserve to list on their applications”) to the virtually difficult (“SAT scores have to be weighted to account for socioeconomic factors”).

Deresiewicz closes his post by saying “I supplied to think that we required to produce a world wbelow eextremely child had actually an equal possibility to gain to the Ivy Organization. I’ve pertained to check out that what we really require is to create one wright here you don’t have to go to the Ivy Organization, or any exclusive college, to gain a first-rate education and learning.” This is an admirable sentiment. It implicitly recognizes that students at Yale U and students at State U will have actually huge classes taught by graduate aides. What I have actually learned from following the careers of my previous students is that talented motivated human being go to personal colleges AND public ones; and that talented, encouraged civilization will certainly make the most of their avenues wherever before they wind up. The problem of revenue inehigh quality is inextricably tied up with America’s damaged political system; that is why so many type of underfunded public colleges fail to provide for their students and why so many type of Americans struggle amid falling wperiods and disappearing methods. Regardless of their good intentions, personal colleges will not have the ability to adjust this. 

I find Deresiewicz’s short article thought-provoking, but as you deserve to tell, many of my thoughts are derisive: to me he seems insufferably stuck-up, shpermit and I hope his book is much better sourced than this article. In brief, I think that “don’t send your boy to the Ivy League” is needlessly reductive and also sets up a straw male. My job is helping students find the colleges that will be the best “fit” for them. Colleges are not the exact same, and also not eincredibly school is equally excellent for everyone. As my mother would certainly say, “that’s why there’s chocolate and vanilla”, or in this situation, that’s why there are 3 and also a half thousand also colleges in America. For various other viewpoints, please consider analysis J.D. Chapmale, an independent college educator that disagrees through Deresiewicz on the value of an elite college education and learning. You might additionally desire to check out Andrew Giambrone, a self-determined “financial aid child whose life-prospects were considerably bolstered by attfinishing an elite school”, or even Osita Nwanevu, a University of Chicago student that problems the principle that if a perchild doesn’t learn just how to think in college that s/he is a shed cause. I would love to recognize what your thoughts are: please feel free to leave comments below.