So just how do you? What is the advantage of either one? (feel complimentary to write-up web links, I"m googleing as well)Is Stargate (Special Edition) Interlaced?Thanks! :-)


DVD disks are not themselves interlaced or steady. The actual DVD player unit that plays the DVD is either interlaced or gradual. In many cases (relying on the TV kind and pickiness of the viewer), gradual will give you a better, sharp, and even more crisp image. If you"re going to buy a player, I"d imply viewing the very same DVD in each kind of player and also making your very own judgment.

You are watching: How to tell if source is interlaced


All DVDs are interlaced. All DVDs (99.9%) can be de-interlaced to form a steady photo.For a TV, you primarily need a HDTV-capable set in order to check out a steady DVD image. Tbelow are some non-HDTVs that offer this capability, yet very few. If it"s HDTV capable, then you are pretty a lot guaranteed that it can execute progressive scan DVD via the appropriate DVD player.WinDVD, PowerDVD, and so on likewise offer steady scan DVD playago on a computer system monitor. The de-interlace performance (and thus quality of the image) varies by regime, via WinDVD often related to as the ideal (although performance of all the top programs is pretty close).


A DVD is either interlaced or non-interlaced, not interlaced or steady. Progressive scan is a method of interpreting the frames in a playearlier mode. You have the right to uncover even more information at:www.hometheaterhifi.comA DVD player is either progressive sdeserve to or not gradual shave the right to.


Alot of DVD"s are NTSC encoded i.e. interlaced, newly I picked up American Pie 2 which I noticed was Progressivly encoded. On a NTSC source you have the right to watch some shave the right to line artifacts, however it only happens at the finish of the movie.


You"re correct, I am horribly confused! View image: /infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif Actually I expected to ask about Adaptive Deinterlacing. I"ve watched people asking around that and their Anime DVD"s. Is this frequently done to US Movie DVD"s too?Sorry to hit you all up via such mundane DVD inquiries. Thanks in advance!~~~Eric~~~


Deinterlacing would certainly be done in hardware therefor through the player. Different dvds percreate deinterlacing to various degrees of high quality. I"d imply hitting up that attach and also analysis around the tests they perform and how the players take care of, it"s all extremely detailed and also yet basic to follow.


If you"re talking around ripping, then the the majority of desireable thing to perform is view if the movie have the right to be reconstructed structure by structure (IVTC). Practically, the method I execute it is watch if you deserve to "force film" in DVD2AVI. With Anime, this is almost never before feasible (from what I understand). If you can"t perdevelop IVTC, then you"ll need to do some sort of deinterlacing, which is the point you"re curious around, "adaptive deinterlacing". Adaptive deinterlacing is somepoint I recognize nothing around, sorry. View image: /infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif


I should understand better than to post at work-related, I"m never clear sufficient since I constantly have actually ten points to do!Anyway, many of my DVD watching is done on my Mac since I have an S-Video out on the Radeon. Finally, ATI had presented Adaptive Deinterlacing into the Drivers so it is an accessible choice while utilizing the latest OS9 Apple DVD player application. (2.7 I think)While watching Stargate this weekend, many of the rapid actions scenes exhibited some bluriness, and I was simply wondering if the deinterlacing mode had actually anypoint to execute through it currently that I"m a lot even more clear on Progressive vs. Interlacing.Thanks!


It"s difficult to say without having imperiods of the source initially. If you could look at the source .vob files then you can determine if the difficulty lies in your hardware, cables or software application. Bluriness is a little vague for me too. The if the picture gets blurry I doubt that hregarding execute through deinterlacing, possibly more with the DVD formatting itself. Deinterlacing gets rid of interlacing artefacts.

See more: " Why You Got To Be So Mean To Me An, Vs Why You Gotta Be So Mean


All DVDs are "interlaced". Eextremely last among them. DVD is indeed an interlaced format, to condevelop through NTSC TV standards, which of course calls for 60 fields/sec, 30 odd lines and then 30 also lines eincredibly second. DVD MPEG2 is therefore encoded in this way.However before, DVDs deserve to be encoded from different kinds of resource product.One sort of source is "progressive", which indicates that the odd and also also areas contain pieces of the exact same photo. This is commonly just how films are encoded, because films are typically telecined from an actual film resource. Some movies go right digital to digital (i.e. Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within) yet it provides feeling to encode also a digital film from an non-interleaved resource.The other is "interleaved" which indicates the odd and also also fields are independent, and in some situations the odd field deserve to contain part of one frame and also the even field part of the following, or vice versa. This is commonly just how DVDs encoded from sources swarm for TV, i.e. not swarm on film. Confoffered yet?Think of it this method. To screen imperiods on a TV, it matters not at all if the also and odd fields are unsynchronized, given that at any type of provided time the electron gun is only illustration the also or the odd area anymethods. But on a computer system monitor, which draws the whole image at as soon as and also not alternating even/odd lines, it matters fairly a lot. This is why if you take a DVD encoded from any type of kind of videotape source, you will gain scanline artifacting if you try to force "weave" deinterlacing, which sindicate takes the also and odd areas and merges them, bereason in instances of quick movement the also and odd fields are not in sync. As such, you use either "bob" (which alternates the even/odd fields, simply prefer a TV) or "blend" (which I can"t explain in a brief blurb). However, a DVD encoded from a telecined film source will certainly not have any kind of artifacting, because the also and also odd fields are constantly synced, because they are from a film, and a film is a series of whole frames.The basic way to tell if your DVD was encoded from an interlaced or steady source is to make your DVD player proggie "pressure weave" and also then see if the picture is a mess with all kinds of scanline artifacting in high-activity scenes.quote:Originally posted by EGPoulin: Is Stargate (Special Edition) Interlaced?Yes, the Stargate Special Edition is from an interleaved source. In reality the Stargate SE DVD (which I own) recycles the carry used for the widedisplay VHS version, and also bereason of this it gets absolutely NO improvement from the DVD format. Basically the Stargate SE DVD sucks cock, the image quality is virtually as negative as the VHS and it costs more. On the up side, I only phelp $1.24 for my Stargate SE DVD (way ago when dotcom movie stores didn"t feel that making money was important) so I guess I"m not also pissed. View image: /infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif


*

Jump to: Select a forum ------------------ Hardware & Tweaking Audio/Visual Club Case and Cooling Fetish CPU & Motherboard Technologia Mobile Computing Outwrite-up Netfunctioning Matrix Other Hardware Agora Classifieds Some Assembly Required Operating Systems & Software Battlefront Microsoft OS & Software Colloquium Linux Kung Fu Windows Technical Mojo Distributed Computing Arcana Macintoshian Achaia Programmer"s Symposium The Server Room Ars Lykaion Gaming, Extra Strength Capallows The Lounge The Soap Box The Boardroom The Observatory Bizarro Lounge Ars Subscription Member Areas Image Galleries

© Ars Technica 1998-2021

Powered by phpBB and also...

*
Ars OpenForum powered by Server Central

*