Everywbelow on steustatiushistory.org world are saying its an excellent point. My uncle is saying that its a bad point. His debate is that before net neutrality the internet was fine. Another one is that the legislation suits versus verizon for slowing down connection speeds lost to Verizon. Please help me


*

It's a great thing. Your uncle is saying that bereason 1) he has actually no principle about the internet 2) he hates anypoint Obama did, including the excellent things. The internet was fine. But net neutrality made it much better. If we took it ameans currently. It would be absolutely shit.

You are watching: Is net neutrality good or bad reddit


Its a bad point for ISPs b/c via neutrality, they can't charge you a package deal depending upon what sites you visit, or how a lot you downfill. And they can't fleece tiny company who simply want equal access to their customers.

Net Nutrality; Good for consumers Bad for profits


So wanting customers to pay for what they usage is "fleecing" now? Are these ISPs intended to be charities?


You have a town with a nice community and also no theft. Never. So tbelow was no law against theft.

But the brand-new tvery own mayor comes and also says that theft must be banned.

Your uncle is the dumbass who says "We don't require that legislation, before that law tright here was no theft in our area. It will make things worse.".

Well he's right that before that regulation tbelow was no theft but isn't it much better to have that regulation to prevent theft in the future? How does he understand tbelow will certainly never ever before be any theft?

Net neutrality is favor that law. It stays clear of ISPs from doing shady shit to throttle the internet. True, they never did that before the law existed. But exactly how do you know they willnever attempt it in the future? Isn't it better to have a law so they deserve to never before attempt it in the future?


3
Share
ReportSave
level 2
· 3y

This is the a lot of retarded stupid bullshit I've ever check out.

prior to that law there was no theft yet isn't it much better to have that law to prevent theft in the future?

No, it's objectively, definitely not much better.


1
Share
ReportSave
Continue this thread 


level 1
· 3y
Everypoint was fine appropriate up until it wasn't. In 2014, a year before ISPs were reclassified as teleinteractions by the FCC, Comcast began throttling Netflix unmuch less they phelp added. This is specifically what net neutrality prevents; it just wasn't that massive of a difficulty prior to a few years earlier since no one really tried it.


2
Share
ReportSave
level 2
· 3y

To be clear though, when you say they made Netflix pay "extra", by "extra" you just expect an amount proportional to the huge amount of band-with they usage, right?


1
Share
ReportSave
level 1
· 3y · edited 3y

The factor that neutrality was proposed and also enacted in the first location is because the ISPs in miscellaneous locations began limiting website traffic to certain sites and solutions. It was a solution to the ISPs trying to take advantage of their recently grvery own oligopoly.

If there were even more competition, then I think net neutrality would not be important. Back in the dial-up days, it was basic simply to switch ISPs. You literally simply dubbed different number to attach to the internet utilizing the public phone lines. Because of that, tright here was plenty of competition giving differing levels of company depending upon what you were trying to find. This is more than likely the internet that your uncle is referencing.

Nowadays, the cable lines and now fiber lines are mainly not public, however owned by personal companies. These carriers primarily perform not share the lines, so any kind of brand-new ISPs that want to start a Broadband also firm need to lay down their very own lines which need permits and use of specific poles that might or may not be privately owned, so it provides it a lot even more hard to start up and also produce the competition that was all earlier in the dial-up days.

See more: Which Is The Largest Level Of Classification On This List ? Taxonomic Hierarchy

So, if you don't desire to seize the currently privately owned cables and fiber hidden anywhere the states or spfinish copious quantities of taxpayer dollars structure public cables and fiber all across the states, then net neutrality is pretty much the just way to limit the capability of these other carriers to restrict wright here we can go and what we have the right to do on the internet.