I was watching a video of a John Kasich tvery own hall the various other day, and also someone asked if he supported passing an amendment to provide the president the power of a line-item veto. I've never before also really believed around this, and also I don't recognize any of the arguments.

You are watching: Pros and cons of line item veto

So, what are the arguments for and versus consisting of this power? Why has this never before really been lugged up for debate?


· 6y · Stickied comment
A reminder for everyone. This is a substeustatiushistory.org for real discussion:

Don't article low effort comments choose joke threads, memes, slogans, or links without context.

Help proccasion this substeustatiushistory.org from becoming an echo chamber. Please don't downvote comments that you disagree via.

The downvote and report butlots are not disagree butlots. Please don't use them that way.

Violators will certainly be fed to the bear.

I am a bot, and also this activity was perdeveloped instantly. Please contact the moderators of this substeustatiushistory.org if you have any type of inquiries or comes to.

The biggest con is that it lets the President readjust the regulation from what Congress passes.

Let's say that the Majority and Minority leadership functions together and passes weaken legislation that trades global background checks for nationwide reciprocity of hidden lug permits.

Then, a Republideserve to president vetos the background inspect portion. Boom, weaken erased.

A line-item veto for the president was actually completed in 1996, once Bill Clinton signed the Line Item Veto Act of 1996. However before, it was ruled unconstitutional about a year later, which is why an amendment would certainly be vital to lug it ago.

It seems favor it was greatly supplied for the federal budacquire - Congress might pass an imperfect bill, knowing that the President would veto unacceptable items. In concept this would aid stop a government shutdvery own.

It's touted as a meacertain to sheight pork-barrel spfinishing, but it offers the President basically unlimited discretion to uncarry out Congressional deteriorate and also eventually provides it harder for them to gain anything done. You're not going to have the ability to acquire a deal through if the President can simply veto your fifty percent. Plus it's plainly unconstitutional.

I choose Governors and also I tend to think they'd be better at running the country than Senators, yet this is among a couple of locations wright here state-level executive national politics doesn't assist you in Federal executive national politics.

Pro: Congress passes a bill that has actually all sorts of unassociated shit on it, such as a defense spfinishing bill that likewise has actually attached a section defunding planned parent hood.

See more: Where Did The Phrase Piss Poor Come From, Lies, Damn Lies, And The 1500S

Con: The party not in the white house will never before damage again because the gains they would acquire in such a bill will certainly be vetoed by the president leaving a clean bill for the president's party.