Yes, and so is eincredibly otherhuman language!Language is always transforming, evolving, and adapting to the demands of its users.

You are watching: Which sentence best explains why modern english reflects the influence of several languages?

This isn"t a poor thing; if English hadn"t changed considering that, say, 1950, we wouldn"t have words to refer to modems, fax makers, or cable TV. As long as the demands of language customers continue to adjust, so will certainly the language. The readjust is so slow that from year to year we hardly notice it, other than to grumble eexceptionally so often about the ‘bad English’ being provided by the younger generation! However, reading Shakespeare"s works from the sixteenth century have the right to be hard. If you go ago a pair even more centuries, Chaucer"sCanterbury Talesare very challenging sledding, and also if you went ago an additional 500 years to attempt to readBeowulf, it would certainly be like reading a various language.

Why does language change?

Language transforms for several factors. First, it transforms because the requirements of its speakers readjust. New modern technologies, brand-new products, and brand-new experiences need new words to describe them plainly and also successfully.Consider texting: initially it was dubbed text messaging, bereason it permitted one perboy to sfinish an additional message rather than voice messeras by phone.As that came to be even more widespread, people began utilizing the shorter formtextto describe both the messageandthe procedure, as inI simply acquired a textorI"ll text Sylviaideal currently.


Another reason for readjust is that no two world have had exactly the exact same languageendure. We all know a slightly various set of words and constructions, depending upon our age, job, education and learning level, area of the nation, and also so on. We pick up new words and also phrases from all the different people we talk with, and these incorporate to make somepoint brand-new and also unchoose any kind of other person"s specific way of speaking. At the exact same time, various teams in culture usage language as a means of marking their team identity; mirroring that is and also isn"t a member of the group.

Many of the changes that happen in language start with teens and young adults. As young people communicate with others their very own age, their language grows to include words, phrases, and also constructions that are different from those of the older generation. Some have a brief life span (heardgroovylately?), however others stick roughly toaffect the languageas a whole.

We get new words from many type of various places. We borrow them from various other languages (sushi, chutzpah), we produce them by shortening much longer words (gymfromgymnasium) or by combining words (brunchfrombreakfastandlunch), and also we make them out of appropriate names (Levis,fahrenheit). Sometimes we even create a brand-new word by being wrong around the evaluation of an existing word, favor exactly how the wordpeawas produced. Four a century back, the wordpeasewas offered to refer to either a solitary pea or a bunch of them, however over time, people assumed Excerpt from Beowulf

thatpeasewas a plural create, for whichpeamust be the singular. Because of this, a brand-new word,pea, was born. The exact same thing would certainly happen if human being started to think of the wordcheeseas referring to even more than onechee.

Word order likewise transforms, though this procedure is a lot sreduced. Old English word order was much more "free" than that of Modern English, and even comparing the Early Modern English of the King James Scriptures with today"s English reflects differences in word order. For instance, the King James Scriptures equates Matthew 6:28 as "Consider the lilies of the field, just how they grow; they toil not." In a more current translation, the last expression is translated as "they do not toil,” because English no longer placesnotafter the verb in a sentence.

Thesounds of a languagechange over time, as well. About 500 years back, English started to undergo a major adjust in the way its vowels were pronounced. Before that,geesewould certainly have rhymed via today"s pronunciation ofchallenge, whilemicewould have rhymed with today"speace. However, a "Great Vowel Shift" started to happen, during which theaysound (as inpay) adjusted toee(as infee) in all the words containing it, while theeesound readjusted toi(as inpie). Overall, salso different vowel sounds were impacted. If you"ve ever wondered why many various other European languages spell the soundaythrough an ‘e’ (as infiancé), and also the soundeevia an‘i’(as inaria), it"s because those langueras didn"t undergo the Great Vowel Change, just English did.

Wasn"t English even more elegant in Shakespeare"s day?

People tfinish to think that older creates of languages are even more elegant, logical, or ‘correct’ than modern creates, but it"s simply not true.The reality that language is always changing does not expect it"s gaining worse; it"s just ending up being various.


In Old English, a tiny winged creature through feathers was recognized as a brid. With time, the pronunciation changed tobird. Although it"s not hard to imagine youngsters in the 1400"s being scolded for "slurring"bridintobird, it"s clear thatbirdwon out. Nobody this particular day would indicate thatbirdis an incorrect word or a sloppy pronunciation.

The speech trends of young people tfinish to grate on the ears of adults because they"re unacquainted. Also,brand-new wordsand also phrases are used in spoken or informal language sooner than in formal, created language, so it"s true that the phrases you might hear a teenager use may not yet be proper for business letters. But that does not suppose they"re worse - just more recent. For years, English teachers and newspaper editors said that the wordhopefullyshouldn"t be offered to expect "I hope", as inhopetotally it will not rain now, also though world typically offered it that means in informal speech. (Of course nobody complained around other "sentence adverbs" such asfranklyandactually.) The battle againsthopefullyis currently all but shed, and also it appears at the starts of sentences, even in formal files.

If you listen closely, you can hearlanguage change in progress. For instance,anymoreis a word that used to just happen in negative sentences, such asI do not eat pizza anyeven more. Now, in many type of areas of the country, it"s being provided in positive sentences, likeI"ve been eating the majority of pizza anyeven more. In this use,anymoreimplies something prefer "lately". If that sounds odd to you currently, save listening; you may be hearing it in your neighborhood prior to long.

Why can"t human being simply use correct English?

By "correct English", people commonly intend Standard English.Many languageshave actually a traditional form; it"s the create of the language used in federal government, education and learning, and also other formal contexts. But Standard English is actually simply onedialectof English.

What"s vital to realize is that there"s no such point as a "sloppy" or "lazy" dialect.Eexceptionally dialect of eexceptionally language has actually rules- not "schoolroom" rules, prefer "do not split your infinitives", yet fairly the sorts of rules that tell us thatthe cat sleptis a sentence of English, butslept cat theisn"t. These rules tell us what languageisfavor fairly than what itshouldbe prefer.

Different dialects have actually various rules. For example:

(l) I didn"t eat any kind of dinner.

(2) I didn"t eat no dinner.

Sentence (l) adheres to the rules of Standard English; sentence (2) complies with a collection of rules current in a number of various other dialects. Neither is sloppier than the other, they simply differ in the dominance for making a negative sentence. In (l),dinneris noted as negative withany; in (2), it"s marked as negative withno. The rules are different, but neither is even more logical or elegant than the various other. In fact, Old English regularly used "double negatives", parallel to what we watch in (2). Many modern-day langueras, consisting of Italian and Spanish, either enable or need even more than one negative word in a sentence. Sentences choose (2) only sound "bad" if you didn"t take place to grow up speaking a language that provides them.

You may have been taught to avoid "break-up infinitives", as in (3):

(3) I was asked to thoroughly water the garden.

This is shelp to be "ungrammatical" becausethoroughlysplits the infinitiveto water. Why are separation infinitives so bad? Here"s why: seventeenth-century grammarians thought Latin was the appropriate language, so they believed English should be as much prefer Latin as possible. In Latin, an infinitive liketo wateris a single word; it"s impossible to separation it up. So now, 300 years later on, we"re still being taught that sentences prefer (3) are wrong, all because someone in the 1600"s assumed English should be even more like Latin.

Here"s one last instance. Over the past few years, 3 brand-new ways of reporting speech have actually appeared:

(4) So Karen goes, "Wow - I wish I"d been there!"

(5) So Karen is prefer, "Wow - I wish I"d been there!"

(6) So Karen is all, "Wow - I wish I"d been there!"

In (4),goessuggests pretty much the exact same thing assaid; it"s used for reporting Karen"s actual words. In (5),is likemeans the speaker is informing us more or much less what Karen shelp. If Karen had actually supplied various words for the very same standard principle, (5) would certainly be correct, however (4) would not. Finally,is allin (6) is a reasonably new construction. In many of the areas wright here it"s supplied, it indicates something similar tois prefer, yet via additional emotion. If Karen had actually ssuggest been reporting the time, it would certainly be okay to sayShe"s prefer, "It"s 5 o"clock,”but odd to sayShe"s all, "It"s five o"clock”unmuch less tright here was something amazing about it being 5 o"clock.

Is it a lazy means of talking? Not at all; the younger generation has actually made a useful three-means distinction where we formerly only had actually the wordshelp.Language will never sheight changing; it will continue to respond to the needs of the human being who use it. So the next time you hear a new expression that grates on your ears, remember that favor everything else in nature, the English language is a job-related in development.

See more: Why Is A Stick Of Gum Like A Sneeze Answers, Why Is Stick Of Gum Like A Sneeze

For even more information

Aitcheson, lean. 1991.Language Change: Progress or Decay?Cambridge: Cambridge College Press.